This is the screen where you need to hit CTRL+ALT+DEL to enter your logon credentials. Optionally, you can switch this to the old fashioned Logon window style of signing in, which is the standard for managed environments.
M3 NTFS FOR MAC WINDOWS
Windows Vista, like XP before it, offers a Welcome screen for logging on to user accounts, by default, in non-managed environments. We'll have to see how Windows Vista fares in the real world when it's released.Īll that said, we can at least compare some of the more important security features from each release. So in some ways, any discussion of security now is somewhat academic. And though it's unlikely that pre-Beta 2 versions of Windows Vista will be targeted by a wide range of hackers, future releases most certainly will be. The Vista beta, after all, is still Windows. The Vista beta adds some security features that OS X has had for years, and it does have a few niceties that OS X lacks. So how does the security of OS X Tiger really compare with that of Windows Vista Beta 1 and the subsequent Community Technical Previews (CTPs)? It's a tough call. If hackers do turn their attentions to OS X, it's unclear whether Apple can respond as quickly as can, say, Microsoft. Though some of OS X's security prowess can be chalked up to design decisions, much of it is because it is simply based on others' work. Put succinctly, Apple can't rest on its laurels. But Microsoft has spent the last several years re-engineering its operating systems and applications to be more secure, and that ongoing work will ultimately result in a system that is quite secure and more easily securable than any of the competition. Therefore, OS X is, in many ways, more secure than Windows is today. Windows, meanwhile, is a minefield of constant hacks and attacks. And OS X, for whatever its worth, benefits from its relatively small market share, compared to Windows: Because the OS X user base is so small, few hackers ever bother to try and attack the system.
M3 NTFS FOR MAC MAC OS
Mac OS X, meanwhile, was truly designed for excellent security, thanks to its wonderful UNIX roots and clean architecture. In short, Windows is a house of cards that seems increasingly incapable of handling today's demands. Windows NT was designed in the pre-Internet days, and though the system's architecture is extensible, modern Windows versions are further hobbled by the inclusion of the buggy and insecure IE Web browser and other design mistakes. Microsoft claims that Windows XP and, by extension, Windows Vista, were architected for security, thanks to their NT roots. Whereas the features in the first part of the comparison where largely related to user interface issues, this time we're dealing more with the nitty-gritty of safety, connectivity, and productivity.
In this second part of the comparison, we'll look a little deeper, and examine security, networking, and power management. The only questions are how much Vista will improve when compared to previous Windows versions, and whether it will be enough to keep customers from moving to OS X. Specifically, OS X will always be elegant, and Windows will almost certainly lag behind in the fit and finish department. Microsoft will iron out the details, I'm sure, but the end result will likely not change much. Vista, meanwhile, is all knees and elbows, an awkward teenager on its way to maturity. For the most part, OS X came out well ahead of Windows Vista, as you'd expect, since it's a polished finished product.
M3 NTFS FOR MAC MAC OS X
In part one of my comparison of Windows Vista Beta 1 and Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger," I looked at three key aspects of each system: Look and feel, desktop search, and data visualization and organization.
0 kommentar(er)
